Stagger on, weary Titan

Tuesday, September 6, 2005 12:05 PM

There are many striking coincidences and parallels between the late, great British Empire and the present American imperium, which does not call itself an empire. See Timothy Ash's article in The Guardian Weekly below for a few. The wise men in Washington apparently have learned nothing from the British Empire experience. America is traveling down the same bloodstained footpath, and for no good reason. The British example was a perfect road map for what to avoid, if there ever was one.

Ash says a few things with which I disagree. He says that the Empire lasted 40 years after 1905, that is, 40 years after the idiotic, disastrous, genocidal Boer War. This is the conventional wisdom. My view is that the Empire lasted in name only after 1918. The American Century, so-called, began at that point, in the aftermath of the Great War. The center of power shifted from Whitehall to the White House then. It was only perfectly obvious in 1945.

Woodrow Wilson's deceitful dragging of America into the European abattoir on behalf of Jingo John Bull in 1917 saved England from near-certain defeat and bankruptcy. Whitehall staggered on from there, at once turning Palestine over to the Zionists in 1920. It was a fat gratuity to the Zionists for their decisive help in Washington in 1916-17 to get the foggy-headed Wilson to change Washington’s stated policy of peace and neutralism in favor of interventionism, war and triumphalism. Bow-wow. The rest is history.

===================================================

Stagger on, weary Titan

Timothy Garton Ash

The Guardian Weekly, Sept. 2-8, 2005

If you want to know what London was like in 1905, come to Washington in 2005. Imperial gravitas and massive self-importance. That sense of being the centre of the world, and of needing to know what happens in every corner of the world because you might be called on--or at least feel called upon--to intervene there.

Hyperpower. Top dog. And yet, gnawing away beneath the surface, the nagging fear that your global supremacy is not half so secure as you would wish. As Joseph Chamberlain, the British colonial secretary, put it in 1902: "The weary Titan staggers under the too vast orb of his fate."

The United States is now that weary Titan. In the British case, the angst was a result of the unexpectedly protracted, bloody and costly Boer war, in which a small group of foreign insurgents defied the mightiest military the world had seen; concern about the rising economic power of Germany and the US; and a combination of imperial overstretch with socio-economic problems at home.

In the American case, it's a result of the unexpectedly protracted, bloody and costly Iraq war, in which a small group of foreign insurgents defies the mightiest military the world has seen; concern about the rising economic power of China and India; and a combination of imperial overstretch with socio-economic problems at home.

Iraq is America's Boer war. Remember that after the British had declared the end of major combat operations in the summer of 1900, the Boers launched a campaign of guerrilla warfare that kept British troops on the run for another two years. The British won only by a ruthlessness of which, I'm glad to say, the democratic, squeamish and still basically anti-colonialist US appears incapable. In the end, the British had 450,000 British and colonial troops there (compared with some 150,000 US troops in Iraq), and herded roughly a quarter of the Boer population into concentration camps, where many died.

In a recent CNN/Gallup poll, 54% of those asked said it was a mistake to send American troops into Iraq, and 57% said the Iraq war has made the US less safe from terrorism. The protest camp outside President Bush's ranch in Crawford, which grew around the mother of a soldier who died in Iraq, exemplifies the pain. CNN has aired a documentary explaining in detail how the intelligence on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction was distorted, abused, sexed up and, as the programme was entitled, Dead Wrong.

This will hardly be news for British or European readers, but the facts have not been so widely aired in the US. In another poll, the number of those who rated the president as "honest" fell below 50% for the first time. He has again attempted to bolster support for his administration and his war. It doesn't seem to be working.

A recent article in the New York Times plausibly estimated the prospective long-term cost of the Iraq War at more than $1 trillion. Now that Iraqi politicians have finally agreed a draft constitution for their country, only the world's greatest optimist can believe that it will turn Iraq into a peaceful democratic federal republic. Increasingly, the Islamic Republic of Iran quietly calls the shots in the Shia south of Iraq. As the Washington joke goes: the war is over, and the Iranians won.

Meanwhile oil prices of $70 a barrel put the price of petrol at American pumps up to $3 a gallon for basic unleaded fuel. For someone from Europe this is still unbelievably cheap, but you should hear the shrieks of agony. "Gas prices have changed my life," moaned a distressed California commuter. If higher energy prices persist, they threaten not just a still vibrant economy but a whole way of life, symbolised by the Hummer.

Besides instability in the Middle East, the main force pushing up oil prices is the relentless growth of demand for energy from the emerging economic giants of Asia. The Chinese go around the world quietly signing big oil supply deals with any oil-producing country they can find, however nasty its politics, including Sudan and Iran. When a Chinese concern tried to buy a big California energy company, that was too much--American politicians screamed and effectively blocked the deal.

China and India are to the US today what Germany and America were to Britain a hundred years ago. China is now the world's second-largest energy consumer, after the US. It also has the world's second-largest foreign currency reserves, after Japan and followed by Taiwan, South Korea and India. In the foreign reserve stakes, the US comes only ninth, after Singapore and just before Malaysia.

According to some economists, the US has an effective net savings rate--taking account of all public spending and debt--of zero. It does not save; it spends. TV channels are full oof commercials, enticing you to spend, spend, spend - and then to "consolidate" your debt in one easy package.

None of this is to suggest that the US will decline and fall tomorrow. Far from it. After all, the British empire lasted for another 40 years after 1905. In fact, it grew to its largest extent after 1918, before it signed its own death warrant by expending its blood and treasure to defeat Adolf Hitler (not the worst way to go).

Similarly, one may anticipate that America's informal empire--its network of military bases and semi-protectorates--will continue to grow. The US, like Edwardian Britain, still has formidable resources of economic, technological and military power, cultural attractiveness and, not least, the will to stay on top. As one British music hall ditty at that time proclaimed:

And we mean to be top dog still.
Bow-wow.
Yes, we mean to be top dog still.

You don't have to go very far to hear that refrain in Washington today. The Bush administration's national security strategy makes no bones about the goal of maintaining military supremacy. But whether the "American century" that began in 1945 will last until 2045, 2035 or only 2025, its end can already be glimpsed on the horizon.

If you are, by any chance, of that persuasion that would instinctively find this a cause for rejoicing, pause for a moment to consider two things: first, that major shifts of power between rising and falling great powers have usually been accompanied by major wars; and second, that the next top dog could be a lot worse.

So this is no time for schadenfreude. It's a time for critical solidarity. A few far-sighted people in Washington are beginning to formulate a long-term American strategy of trying to create an international order that would protect the interests of liberal democracies even when American hyperpower has faded; and to encourage rising powers such as India and China to sign up to such an order. That is exactly what today's weary Titan should be doing, and we should help him do it.

**
© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2005